Wednesday, 5 November 2008

The board back Pardew

Not being shy at completely changing my mind when it suits me I am about to surprise a few people with my latest best plan.

I have little knowledge of running a football club. I have limited experience of management in business, and I think having a team (players or managers) that are independently wealthy is different again.

I have made it clear that I have lost confidence in Alan Pardew, I still believe that the fortunes of the first team would be better served with a new direction, but I am willing to give the board the benefit of doubt.

I have a small reservation about the board's motives. if they just want rid of the club now due to the increasing financial burden then maybe keeping Pardew is the cheapest option until they get out. However, having met Richard Murray and read Derek Chappell's comments on Charlton Live I don't think they would do harm to the club, and are probably looking to sell so that the new owners can invest what we need that they are not able to provide.

Thus I have to assume that there is another reason that they have given Pardew their backing - including agreeing to sign further players on loan. A two minute brainstorming session brings up the following list of reasons that they may be considering:

1> The price of removing Pardew would cost money we just don't have;
2> The board have made (secret) enquiries about replacements and come up with nothing; or
3> They've seen something that the fans haven't - either in training or in meetings etc.

Let me expand on those a little. Point 1 is obvious. These chaps have put lots of their money into the club and it is clear that the cost of removing Pardew will have to come from a cash injection. I'm not just talking about the severance pay, I'm talking about the recruitment costs of the replacement. Unless we want a manager out of work we will have to pay compensation to the club he is currently employed by. Chances are that any unemployed 'Big Name' - Hoddle, Allardyce, Curbishley et. al.- will want a lump sum or a long term contract. This is before we calculate the cost of the new man wanting to remove Parkinson and possibly Kinsella and bring in his own team that will also need to be 'recruited'. There is also the possibility that the new man will want to sign players and if the only option is sell before you buy we could lose our best players at knock down prices to make that change.

I think point 2 is, again, simple enough. I have no idea, but if Curbishley has been approached (for example) and said "No chance", and the agents of other replacements have made it clear that they would prefer to stay away, what can we do. Clearly if you offer enough money you can have anyone you like, but what would it cost to tempt a millionaire football manager to dirty his hands with a relegation fight, no money for transfers, a very demotivated team with no confidence and, let's face it, an unhappy group of fans who have expectations well above their station and are happy to boo their manager, and have, in fact, called for the sacking of the last two? I know this goes back to point one, but it's still a factor. The quality of an out of work manager that will take us on has to be assumed to low.

The third point relates to Pardew as well as Parkinson and Kinsella. The board may see something in Pardew that we fans do not. Either way they are in a better position to judge Parkinson and Kinsella. I have no idea if under good conditions (let alone the mess we are currently in) either of these two men would be able to produce the goods for Charlton, but if the board have few (or no) outside candidates then they have to consider promoting from within. Despite the Les Reed spectacle, I think promoting from within can be a success. The board will have had contact with the two obvious internal candidates and may doubt them. We have no idea, but to do nothing can be the least risky option when you are not confident of the alternatives. Better the devil you know? This is, of course, assuming that either of them would be willing to put their reputations on the line and risk ending up being the next Les Reed?

Over all I am not able, either with this blog or by my behaviour at The Valley, to force the board to act. Maybe if the pressure continues to grow Pardew will have to go. Maybe that is the best way forward, but if the board are determined to keep him (at least for now) we could cause more damage in the short term by destroying the manager's ability to raise confidence in an already fragile group of players.

I also have to confess that I am beginning to feel like part of a witch hunt. I'm confident that the fans only want what is best for the club, but we could be wrong. It is possible that, as horrendous a thought as it is, Pardew is the very best option based on what I have described above (and other things that I've not even thought of). Even if his departure is the correct way forward, I think that the board know how the fans think and continuing to raise the level of 'hate' against a man that is clearly doing his best is just not something I want to be part of.

Thus, for now, I am going to revert to Plan A. I'm going to believe, no hope, no pray that we can turn it around. I'm going to embrace the new loan players and give them (and the current ones) all the support that I can. I'm going to cross my fingers and toes and ram my head in a hole of sand in the ground. At the end of the day there is not much more I can do. The board will make the decision, and they probably don't even read my blog anyway.

I'm not leaving the Redvolution behind, and what will be will be, but in the meantime I will be looking for positives; I will be looking for reasons to be cheerful; I will be acting like the quintessential Charlton fan.

Up the Addicks!


Anonymous said...

A very sane and logical piece BA.

I have strong desire to see Mr Pardew leave. Fact is, whilst the Board know our feelings, if we drop the pressure it is easier for them to let the situation ride.

I am in a quandray and do wonder if fan power, which has served us well in the past, should again be employed. But our fan power has been based upon constructive methods, not mindless booing.

In short I think we still need keep up the pressure - but find more appropriate tools that don't impinge upon the team performance.

Pembury Addick

Kings Hill Addick said...

My worry Pembury is that the board cannot (or will not) be forced into making a change. If that is the case any uprising will cause more damage than good.

Clearly we don't know what the board members are thinking right now, which makes our actions a gamble. We may be able to change their minds, but if they are to be believed, and Pardew is safe for the foreseeable future then I will (reluctantly) accept it while giving my utmost support to the team and their manager.

Anonymous said...

A very sensible piece. The idea of a "Redvolution" is ridiculous. I'm also very doubtful that Pards can turn this around, but if the Board genuinely believe he is the right option then fair enough. Let's keep our fingers crossed they have it right. "Lobbying" them to fire Pardew and/or booing the team is entirely counterproductive. Those doing the latter are either retarded, have no emotional control or don't have the club's interests at heart despite protestations to the contrary.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Web hosting is a server on serving and maintaining files looking for one or more net sites.
A web hosting accommodation is a genus of Internet hosting service that longing help an special, house, school, administration league and more consider their website on the World Large Web.
[url=]Web hosting [/url] companies provide rank on a server for take advantage of via their clients as grandly as the internet accessibility required to get on the web.
Sober-sided more important than the computer space is a sound situation in behalf of the files and a fast link to the Internet.
There are multifarious different types of spider's web hosts, rule panels, operating systems, and options.
In totalling there are included services such as website builders, search motor marketing, database deployment, and online stores.
So how do you know what to exploit and who to hit it off with b manage it from?
Since they are so many options this can be confusing.
The first thing you extremity to come to a decision is if you hope for a Windows web publican or a linux web host.
Much of the while it does not affair though if you have specific software to play such as a shopping transport or database bearing this wishes be important.
It is choicest to upon minus from your software provider the requirements of the program.
Then you devise requisite to umpire fix on if you need a province baptize and the amount of leeway and bandwidth needed.
Various cobweb hosting companies literally give away empire names to new customers so this may staff grip your business.
In addendum scads entanglement hosts also give a leviathan amount of space and bandwidth in their hosting plans hoping you disposition not actually needfulness it.
So now that you have firm on the operating methodology and how much you want every now contract out us look at the options.
A entirely habitual chance is the speak of a free website builder. This can be eminent if you should prefer to no or smidgen savvy with html programming. If you have some participation and resort to a database you will then need to decide how varied databases you require. Some hosts inclination cede you unlimited databases and some cost per database. There are also innumerable other freebies accessible such as automated hand (software) base, shopping carts, templates, search engine optimization assistance, unlimited discipline hosting and much more. Spam prevention is also an powerful characteristic you should calculate from your host.
Things being what they are that you be dressed start the options you are looking for it is time to look in compensation a host.
Wow! There are so many. A simple search in search the term web manager will make thousands of results. So who do you choose?
A web emcee should at all times be within reach in for fear that b if you have need of assistance. At the least they should drink a support desk and faq quarter in protection you secure questions. If thinkable a phone number is also helpful. They should also accommodate a fast server so your website is instantly detectable and not stupid to view. In uniting they should equip no or very baby downtime. This is when your website is not visible at all. In the long run your files should be in a secure environment. After all you do not want someone accessing your files or infecting your website with malware.
To conclude they are varied snare hosting options and hosts. It is leading to do your homework to put one's finger on the pre-eminent equal pro your website.